Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 218, 2020
2020 International Symposium on Energy, Environmental Science and Engineering (ISEESE 2020)
Article Number 01037
Number of page(s) 5
Section Research on Energy Technology Application and Consumption Structure
Published online 11 December 2020
  1. Alam S S, Khatibi A, Ahmad M I S, et al. Factors affecting e‐commerce adoption in the electronic manufacturing companies in Malaysia[J]. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  2. Boyd DM, Ellison NB. Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship[J]. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 2007, 13(1): 210-230. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bulmer D, DiMauro V. 2nd Annual New Symbiosis of Professional Networks study. Retrieved from 2011. [Google Scholar]
  4. Castronovo C, Huang L. Social media in an alternative marketing communication model. Journal of marketing development and competitiveness. 2012 Feb 1;6(1):117-34. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheung, Christy MK, and Matthew KO Lee. “A theoretical model of intentional social action in online social networks.” Decision support systems 49. 1 (2010): 24-30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. CNNIC Internet Research. Release of the 43rd CNNIC China Internet Report[J]. China Broadcasting, 2019(4). [Google Scholar]
  7. Cubillo JM, Sánchez J, Cerviño J. International students’ decision‐making process. International Journal of Educational Management. 2006 Feb 1. [Google Scholar]
  8. Daft RL, Lengel RH. Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. Texas A and M Univ College Station Coll of Business Administration; 1983 May. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fagerstrøm, Asle, Gordon R. Foxall, and Erik Arntzen. “Implications of motivating operations for the functional analysis of consumer choice.” Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 30.2 (2010): 110-126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Foxall, Gordon R., and M. Mirella Yani-de-Soriano. “Situational influences on consumers’ attitudes and behavior.” Journal of Business Research 58.4 (2005): 518-525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Foxall G. Understanding consumer choice. Springer; 2005 Mar 11. [Google Scholar]
  12. Foxall, Gordon R., and M. Mirella Yani-de-Soriano. “Situational influences on consumers’ attitudes and behavior.” Journal of Business Research 58.4 (2005): 518-525. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Foxall, Gordon R., et al. “Consumer behavior analysis and the behavioral perspective model.” Management Online Review (MORE) (2011). [Google Scholar]
  14. Galan M, Lawley M, Clements M. Social media’s use in postgraduate students’ decision-making journey: an exploratory study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education. 2015 Jul 3;25(2):287-312. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hanna, Richard, Andrew Rohm, and Victoria L. Crittenden. “We’re all connected: The power of the social media ecosystem.” Business horizons 54.3 (2011): 265-273. [Google Scholar]
  16. Head, A., and Eisenberg, M., 2010. How today’s college students use Wikipedia for course-related research. First Monday, 15(3). [Google Scholar]
  17. Holliday, W., and Li, Q., 2004. Understanding the millennials: updating our knowledge about students. Reference services review. [Google Scholar]
  18. Kahai SS, Cooper RB. Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision quality. Journal of management information systems. 2003 Jul 1;20(1):263-99. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kaplan, Andreas M., and Michael Haenlein. “Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media.” Business horizons 53.1 (2010): 59-68. [Google Scholar]
  20. Kietzmann, Jan H., et al. “Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media.” Business horizons 54.3 (2011): 241-251. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim, K.S., Sin, S.C.J., and Yoo-Lee, E.Y., 2014. Undergraduates’ use of social media as information sources. [Google Scholar]
  22. Koufaris, Marios, Ajit Kambil, and Priscilla Ann LaBarbera. “Consumer behavior in web-based commerce: an empirical study.” International journal of electronic commerce 6.2 (2001): 115-138. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kandel E, Lazear EP. Peer pressure and partnerships. Journal of Political Economy. 1992 Aug 1;100(4):801-17. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Levy L. A study of sports crowd behavior: The case of the great pumpkin incident. Journal of Sport and Social Issues. 1989 Sep;13(2):69-91. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. McNamara C, Chur‐Hansen A, Hay P. Emotional responses to food in adults with an eating disorder: a qualitative exploration[J]. European Eating Disorders Review: The Professional Journal of the Eating Disorders Association, 2008, 16(2): 115-123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Obar, Jonathan A., and Steven S. Wildman. “Social media definition and the governance challenge-an introduction to the special issue.” Obar JA, and Wildman S. (2015). Social media definition and the governance challenge: An introduction to the special issue. Telecommunications policy 39.9 (2015): 745-750. [Google Scholar]
  27. Parker, C. (2011). 301 ways to use social media to boost your marketing. New York: McGraw-Hill. [Google Scholar]
  28. Power DJ, Phillips-Wren G. Impact of social media and Web 2.0 on decision-making. Journal of decision systems. 2011 Jan 1;20(3):249-61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Rosen D, Stefanone M A, Lackaff D. Online and offline social networks: Investigating culturallyspecific behavior and satisfaction[C]//2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE, 2010: 1-10. [Google Scholar]
  30. Sawyer R, Chen G M. The impact of social media on intercultural adaptation[J]. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  31. Shaw ME. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. McGraw-Hill College; 1981. [Google Scholar]
  32. Weinberg, Tamar. “The new community rules: Marketing on the social web.” (2009). [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhao S, Grasmuck S, Martin J. Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in human behavior. 2008 Sep 1;24(5):1816-36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.