Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 233, 2021
2020 2nd International Academic Exchange Conference on Science and Technology Innovation (IAECST 2020)
Article Number 01166
Number of page(s) 5
Section NESEE2020-New Energy Science and Environmental Engineering
Published online 27 January 2021
  1. Pichler S, Varma A, Michel J S, et al. Leader-Member Exchange, Group- and Individual-Level Procedural Justice and Reactions to Performance Appraisals[J]. Human Resource Management, 2016, 55(5):871-883. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sweetman D, Luthans F. “The Power of Positive Psychology: Psychological Capital and Work Engagement.” Work Engagement : A Handbook of Essential Theory and Research.[C].Hoboken: Taylor & Francis, 2010. 54–68. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakker A B, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel A I. Burnout and Work Engagement: The JD-R Approach [J]. Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2014, (1): 389-411. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Vermunt R, Steensma H. Procedural Justice[M]// Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research. Springer New York, 2016:219-220. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lind E A, Tyler T R. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice[J]. Critical Issues in Social Justice, 1988,18(5):70-89. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ng T W H, Feldman D C. Employee voice behavior: A meta-analytic test of the conservation of resources framework[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33(2): 216-234. [Google Scholar]
  7. Jiao L, Zou Z, Wu H. Study on the Influence of Overall Justice Perceptions on Employee Voice Behavior: The Mediating Effect of Employees’ Affect-based Trust and Cognition-based Trust in Supervisors[J]. Jiangsu Science & Technology Information, 2016(1):22-30. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cropanzano R, Anthony E L, Daniels S R, et al. Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2017, 11(1):1-38. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Strom D L, Sears K L, Kelly K M. Work Engagement: The Roles of Organizational Justice and Leadership Style in Predicting Engagement Among Employees[J]. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2014, 21(1):71-82. [Google Scholar]
  10. Magner N, Staley A B. Roles Of Instrumental And Noninstrumental Voice In Members’ Reactions Toward Interorganizational Committees[J]. International Journal Of Organization Theory & Behavior (Pracade), 2014:311-334. [Google Scholar]
  11. Robbins T L, Summers T P, Miller J L, et al. Short Research Note: Using the group-value model to explain the role of noninstrumental justice in distinguishing the effects of distributive and procedural justice[J]. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 2000, 73(73):511-518. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Lira M C. Satisfaction With a Performance Appraisal System in the Portuguese Public Sector: The Importance of Perceptions of Justice and Accuracy[J]. TÉKHNE - Review of Applied Management Studies, 2014, 12:30-37. [Google Scholar]
  13. Korsgaard M A, Roberson L. Procedural justice in performance appraisal: the role of instrumental and non-instrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions[J]. Journal of Management, 1995, 21(4): 657-669. [Google Scholar]
  14. Schaufeli W B. Applying the Job Demands-Resources model: A ‘how to’ guide to measuring and tackling work engagement and burnout[J]. Organizational Dynamics. 2017: 120-132. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wen Peng, Liao Jianqiao. The differential impact of different types of performance appraisal on employee appraisal response——A study from the perspective of appraisal purpose[J]. Nankai Management Review. 2010, 13(2): 142-150. [Google Scholar]
  16. Moon K K. Fairness at the Organizational Level: Examining the Effect of Organizational Justice Climate on Collective Turnover Rates and Organizational Performance[J]. Public Personnel Management, 2017, 46 (2): 118-143. [Google Scholar]
  17. Harari M B, Rudolph C W. The Effect of Rater Accountability on Performance Ratings: A Meta–Analytic Review [J]. Human Resource Management Review, 2016, 27 (1): 121-133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yoshitaka Y, Jeewhan Y. A Cross–National Study of Fairness in Asia: How Perceptions of a Lack–of–Group Bias and Transparency in the Performance Evaluation System Relate to Job Satisfaction [J]. Human Resource Management, 2016, 55 (2): 1059-1077. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.