EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 258 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 258 (2021) 07059 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2021
Ural Environmental Science Forum “Sustainable Development of Industrial Region” (UESF-2021)
Article Number 07059
Number of page(s) 10
Section Psychology of Environmentally Responsible Behavior
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125807059
Published online 20 May 2021
  1. A.Yu. Uvarov, I.D. Frumin, Difficulties and prospects of digital transformation of education (Moscow, NRU High School of Economics 2019) [Google Scholar]
  2. I.A. Karlov, V.O. Kovalev, N.A. Kozhevnikov, E.D. Patarakin, I.D. Frumin, A.N. Shvindt, D.O. Shonov, Express analysis of digital educational resources and services for organizing the educational process of schools in a distance form. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Institute of Education, Moscow, NRU High School of Economics, 4(34), 56 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. D.S. Ermakov, P.N. Kirillov, Personalized model in digital, Educational policy, 3(79), 132–141 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  4. V.I. Blinov, M.V. Dulinov, E.Yu. Yesenina, I.S. Sergeev, Draft didactic concept for digital vocational education and training, 6 (Moscow, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  5. L.V. Snegireva, University e-learning: methodological problems and didactic principles development. AKTUÁLNÍ PEDAGOGIKA, 4, 9–12 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  6. Tchoshanov Mourat. Engineering of learning: conceptualizing e-didactics, UNESCO inst. for inform. technologies in education, 192 (Moscow, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  7. A.N. Pechnikov, E-didactics: who needs it, why and in what form. Educational technology and society, 4 (2013) https://readera.org/14062510 (Last accessed 2021/02/12) [Google Scholar]
  8. N.V. Dvoryanchikov, T.V. Kalashnikova, L.S. Pechnikova, N.V. Frolova, The use of e-learning in the educational process: problems and prospects, Psychological science and education, 21, 2, 76–83 (2016) doi:10.17759/pse.2016210209 [Google Scholar]
  9. G.U. Soldatova, E.I. Rasskazova, T.A. Nestik, The digital generation of Russia: competence and safety, Moscow, Meaning, 375 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. V.N. Dolgopolov, Methodological foundations for studying the influence of modern information technologies on the value-semantic sphere of the individual, North Caucasian psychological bulletin, 13(3), 5–9 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Kergel, B. Heidkamp-Kergel, E-Learning, E-Didaktik und digitales Lernen. SpringerLink, 1–56 (2020) DOI: 10.1007/978-3-658-28277-6. [Google Scholar]
  12. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208392 (Last accessed 2021/02/12) [Google Scholar]
  13. S. Ali, M.A. Uppal, S. Gulliver, A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers. Information Technology & People, 31(1), 156–180 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Arafat, N. Aljohani, R. Abbasi, A. Hussain, M. Lytras, Connections between e-learning, web science, cognitive computation and social sensing, and their relevance to learning analytics: A preliminary study. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 478–486 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  15. D. Benta, G. Bologa, I. Dzitac, E-learning platforms in higher education case study. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 1170–1176 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  16. I. Jahnke, P. Bergström, Digital Didactical Designs as research framework: iPad integration in Nordic schools, Computers & Education, 113, 1–15 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. I. Jahnke, Digital didactical Designs: Teaching and learning in crossaction spaces, 220 (New York, Routledge, 2016) [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Ruthven, The didactical tetrahedron as a heuristic for analysing the incorporation of digital technologies into classroom practice in support of investigative approaches to teaching mathematics, ZDM - The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 44(5), 627–640 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Tchoshanov, Engineering of Learning: Conceptualizing e-Didactics, Moscow the UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education, 194 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Kangas, P. Siklander, J. Randolph, H. Ruokamo, Teachers’ engagement and students’ satisfaction with a playful learning environment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 274–284 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Koc-Januchta, T. Höffle, G.B. Thoma, H. Prechtl, D. Leutner, Visualizers versus verbalizers: Effects of cognitive style on learning with texts and pictures – an eye-tracking study. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 170–179 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  22. D. Clark, Blended Learning: An Epic White Paper, Epic Group plc., 44 (2003) http://www.alapitvany.oktopusz.hu/domain9/files/modules/module15/261489EC2324 A25.pdf. (Last accessed 2021/02/12) [Google Scholar]
  23. E. King, R. Boyatt, Exploring factors that influence adoption of e-learning within higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1272–1280 (2015) https://www.learntechlib.org/p/151955/ (Last accessed 2021/02/12) [Google Scholar]
  24. E. Safapour, S. Kermanshachi, P. Taneja, A Review of Nontraditional Teaching Methods: Flipped Classroom, Gamification, Case Study, Self-Learning, and Social Media. (2019) 10.3390/educsci9040273. [Google Scholar]
  25. G. D’Angelo, From Didactics to E-Didactics - Paradigms, Models and Techniques for e-Learning, 404 (Naples: LIGUORI EDITORE, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  26. I.N. Frolov, E-learning as a form of education in the XXI century. Informatics and Education, 2, 109–110 (Moscow, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  27. E.V. Shirshov, Electronic didactics in the system of higher education, Innovations in vocational and professional pedagogical education: abstracts of the 9th Russian scientific and practical conference, 42–43 (Moscow, Yekaterinburg, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  28. A.A. Andreev, V.I. Soldatkin, Distance learning: essence, technology, organization, 196 (Moscow, 1999) [Google Scholar]
  29. E.Yu. Ilaltdinova, T.K. Belyaeva, T.K. Lebedeva, Digital pedagogy: features of the evolution of the term in the categorical-conceptual apparatus of pedagogy. Prospects for Science and Education, 4(40), 33–43 (2019) DOI: 10.32744/pse.2019.4.3 [Google Scholar]
  30. A.N. Pechnikov, A.N. Shikov, The problem of computer didactics: history, essence and approaches to the solution, Informatics and education, 4, 3–13 (Moscow, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Curtis, Bonk The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, Pfeiffer, 8. Clark, D. Blended Learning: An Epic White Paper, 44 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Domun, G.K. Bahadur, Design and Development of a Self-Assessment Tool and Investigating its Effectiveness for E-Learning, European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(1), 1–25 (2014) DOI: 10.2478/eurodl-2014-0001 [Google Scholar]
  33. G. Dilrukshi, S. Fernando, I. Perera, Factors affecting to effective eLearning: Learners Perspective, Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ), 2, 42–48 (2014) DOI: 10.1109 / UMEDIA.2015.7297461 [Google Scholar]
  34. I. Jahnke, P. Bergström, E. Mårell-Olsson, L. Häll, S. Kumar, Digital Didactical Designs as research framework: iPad integration in Nordic schools. Computers & Education, 113, 1–15 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.05.006 [Google Scholar]
  35. C. Hofmeister, M. Pilz, Using E-Learning to Deliver In-Service Teacher Training in the Vocational Education Sector: Perception and Acceptance in Poland, Italy and Germany. Education Sciences, 10(7), 182 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  36. E. Zuanelli, Elearning Content ‘Usability’: Semiotic and Didactic Parameters in Digital Texts and Textuality, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1039–1049 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.118 [Google Scholar]
  37. E. Voevoda, Digital didactics: technologies & practices. Professional Discourse & Communication (2020) https://doi.org/10.24833/2687-0126-2020-2-2-89-94 [Google Scholar]
  38. L. Zhi-Jiang, N. Tretyakova, V. Fedorov, M. Kharakhordina, Digital Literacy and Digital Didactics as the Basis for New Learning Models Development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 15(14), 4 (2020) DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v15i14.14669 [Google Scholar]
  39. V.I. Toktarova, A.E. Shpak, Digital Pedagogy: Interpretive and Content Analysis, Digital Humanities and Technologies in Education (DHTE 2020). Collection of materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference with international participation. 19–21 November 2020, 28-33 (2020) eLIBRARY ID: 44342523 [Google Scholar]
  40. A.A. Verbitsky, Digital learning: problems, risks and prospects, Electronic scientific journal “Homo Cyberus”, 1(6), (2019) URL: http://journal.homocyberus.ru/Verbitskiy_AA_1_2019 (Last accessed 2021/02/22) [Google Scholar]
  41. I.V. Abakumova, A.M. Kukulyar, V.T. Fomenko, Smyslodidaktika as a systematic embodiment of the general theory of meaning in the practice of the educational process. Russian psychological journal, 11(3), 24–32 (2014) https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2014.3.2 [Google Scholar]
  42. S.A. Shchennikov, Didactics of e-learning, Higher education in Russia, 12, 83–90 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  43. L.V. Lavrent’eva, E.V. Yashkova, V.A. Lavrent’ev, Prerequisites for the transition to digital pedagogy in Russian conditions, Problems of modern pedagogical education, 59-2, 152–156 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  44. I.V. Abakumova, L.V. Kosikova, Features of the semantic sphere of adolescents in the conditions of inclusive education. Russian psychological journal, 6(5), 7–14 (2009) https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2009.5.1 [Google Scholar]
  45. Zh. Nurbekova, B. Baigusheva, The Impact of Digital Transformation of Education on the formation of Digital Didactics. Bulletin of the L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. Pedagogy. Psychology. Sociology Series, 130, 96–101 (2020) 10.32523/2616-6895-2020-130-1-96-101. [Google Scholar]
  46. S.P. Bezolyuk, Meaning formation as a component of the development of digital competences of adolescents, Scientific-methodical electronic journal “Concept”, 12, 41–52 (2020) http://e-koncept.ru/2020/201087.html (Last accessed 2021/02/22) [Google Scholar]
  47. A.N. Dzhurinsky, Digital Education in Western Europe and the USA: Hopes and Reality, Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 3, 162–167 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  48. S.F. Sergeev, Methodological problems of e-Learning didactics, Open education, 3(110), 28–36 (2015) https://doi.org/10.21686/1818-4243-2015-3(110-28-36 (Last accessed 2021/02/25) [Google Scholar]
  49. S. Bezoluk, E. Azarko, V. Sannikova, O. Derezko, The initiation of the students’ meaning formation via the meaning essay E3S Web Conf. 210, 18059 (2020) DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/202021018059 [Google Scholar]
  50. I. Abakumova, N. Mironenkova, D. Penkov, Sense techniques addressed to the student’s subjective experience as the basis of his value-semantic choice on the example of mathematics. Russian psychological journal, 16(2), 63–80 (2019) https://doi.org/10.21702/rpj.2019.2.4 [Google Scholar]
  51. B. Prevalla, H. Uzunboylu, Flipped Learning in Engineering Education, 656–661 (2019) DOI:10.18421/TEM82-46 [Google Scholar]
  52. I. Dhull, S. Arora, Online Learning, 3, 32–34 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  53. L. Singh, R. Thakur, M.T.V. Nagaraju, Online Learning Platforms for Flexible Learning in Educational Framework (2019) [Google Scholar]
  54. M.A. Pinskaya, A.M. Mikhailova, Competencies “4K”: formation and assessment in the lesson: Practical recommendations, 76 (Moscow, Corporation “Russian textbook”, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  55. L.M. Andryukhina, N.V. Lomovtseva, N.O. Sadovnikova, Concepts of digital didactics as the basis for the design of advanced education for vocational education teachers, Vocational education and the labor market, 1(40), 30–43 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  56. A.M. Magomedov, Problems and trends in the development of digital education, Pedagogy and education, 2, 134–142 (2019) DOI 10.7256/2454-0676.2019.2.27084. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.