Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 263, 2021
XXIV International Scientific Conference “Construction the Formation of Living Environment” (FORM-2021)
Article Number 04060
Number of page(s) 11
Section Engineering and Smart Systems in Construction
Published online 28 May 2021
  1. Yoram Cohen, Raphael Semiat, Anditya Rahardianto. A Perspective on Reverse Osmosis Water Desalination: Quest for Sustainability/ AIChE Journai, June 2017, Vol.3, No.6, DOI 10.1002/aic.15726 [Google Scholar]
  2. Arun Subramani, Joseph G. Jacangelo. Treatment technologies for reverse osmosis concentrate volume minimization: A review. Separation and Purification Technology, Volume 122, February 2014, Pages 472-489 [Google Scholar]
  3. Sung Hee Joo, Berrrin Tansel. Novel technologies for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 150, 1 March 2015, Pages 322-335 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee Foster, Jacqueline Kepke, Rebecca Sommer, Damian McCann. Hold the salt; Innovative Treatment of RO Concentrate. Proceedings of the WaterEnvironment Federation, 2008 (14): Pp. 219-230, DOI: 10.2175/19384708788734539 [Google Scholar]
  5. Turek M., Mitko K., Dydo P., Laskovska E., JacobicKolon A. Prospects for high water recovery membrane desalination // Desalination. 2017. Vol. 401. Pp. 180-189. DOI: 10.101/j.desal.201.07.047 [Google Scholar]
  6. Jamaly S., N.N., Darwish N.N., Ahmed I., Hasan S.W. A short review on reverse osmosis pretreatment technologies // Desalination. 2014. Vol. 354., Pp. 30-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.017 [Google Scholar]
  7. Goh P.S., Lau W.J., Othman M.H.D., Ismail A.F. Membrane fouling in desalination and its mitigation strategies // Desalination. 2018. Vol. 425. Pp. 130-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2017.10.018 [Google Scholar]
  8. Jiang S., Li Y., Ladewig B.P. A review of reverse osmosis membrane fouling and control strategies // Science of the total environment. 2017. Vol. 595. Pp. 567-583. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.235 [Google Scholar]
  9. Suratt W.B., Adrews D.R., Pujals V.J., Richards S.A. Design considerations for major membrane treatment facility for groundwater // Proceedings of the Conference on Membranes in Drinking and Industrial Water Production. 2000. Vol. 1. Pp. 61-70 [Google Scholar]
  10. Salman M.A., Al-Nuwaibit G., Safar M., Al-Mesri A. Performance of physical treatment method and different commercial antiscalants to control scaling deposition in desalination plant // Desalination. 2015. Vol. 369. Pp. 18-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.04.023 [Google Scholar]
  11. Veespareni S., Bond R. Getting this last drop: new technology for treatment of concentrate // Tianjin IDA World Congress 2013 on Desalination and Water Reuse, October 2025, China 2013, TIAN 13-357 [Google Scholar]
  12. Li C. et al. Membrane fouling mitigation by coupling applied electric field in membrane system: Configuration, mechanism and performance // Electrochimica Acta. 2018. V. 287. Pp. 124-134 [Google Scholar]
  13. Shalid M.K., Pyo M., Choi Y-G. The operation of reverse osmosis system with C02 as a scale inhibitor: A study on operational behaviour and membrane morphology // Desalination. 2018. V. 426. P.p. 11-20 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chaussemier M., Pourmohtasham E., Gelus D., Pecoul N., Perrot H., lEGION j., Cheap-Charpentier H., Homer O. State of art of natural inhibitors of calcium carbonate scaling. A review article // Desalination, 2015, v. 356, pp. 47-55. DOI: 10.1016/jdesal.2014.10.014 [Google Scholar]
  15. Pramanik B.K., Gao Y., Fan L., Roddick F.A., Liu Z. Antiscaling effect of polyaspartic acid and its derivative for RO membranes used for saline wastewater and brackish water desalination // Desalination. 2017. Vol. 404. Pp. 224-229. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2016.11.019 [Google Scholar]
  16. Li X., Hasson D., Shemer H. Flow conditions affecting the induction period of CaSO4 scaling on RO membranes // Desalination. 2018. Vol. 431. Pp. 119-125. DOI: 10.101/j.desal.2017.08.014 [Google Scholar]
  17. Zimmer K.,Hater W., Icart A. Jaworski J., Kruse N., Braun G. The performance of polycarboxylates as inhibitors for CaCO3 scaling in reverse osmosis plants // Desalination and Water Treatment. 2016. Vol. 57. Issue 48-49. Pp. 2312-23175. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1133874 [Google Scholar]
  18. V.A. Golovesov, A.G. Pervov and A.D. Smirnov. Investigation of scaling mechanism on reverse osmosis membranes using “fluorescent” antiscalant. IPICSE 2020. IOP Publishing. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 1030(2021) 012064. doi: 10.1088/1757899XL/1030/1/012064 [Google Scholar]
  19. Alexei Pervov. Precipitation of calcium carbonate in reverse osmosis retentate flow by means of seeded techniques – a tool to increase recovery. Desalination (2015) pp. 140-151 [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Pervov, A. Andrianov. Deposition of calcium and magnesium from PO concentrate by means of seed crystallization and production of softened water for technical purposes. Desalination and water treatment, (2018) 1-9, pp. 1-9., doi: 10.5004/dwt.2018/2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Golovesov V.A., Rudakova G.Ya., Pervov A.G., Spitsov D.V. The choice of membranes and reagents designed for membrane systems used to treat ground water. Vestnik MGSU [Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture]. 2020; 15(11): 1493-1504. DOI: 10.22227/1997-0935.2020.11.1493-1504 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.