EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 314 (2021) E3S Web Conf., 314 (2021) 04007 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 314, 2021
The 6th edition of the International Conference on GIS and Applied Computing for Water Resources (WMAD21)
Article Number 04007
Number of page(s) 4
Section Geomatics, Remote Sensing and Modelling
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131404007
Published online 26 October 2021
  1. Draoui, Y., et al., Quantification of Surface WaterGroundwater Exchanges by GIS Coupled with Experimental Gauging in an Alluvial Environment. [Google Scholar]
  2. El Mansouri, B. and L.J.P.O.T.I.A.O.H.S. El Mezouary, Enhancement of groundwater potential by aquifer artificial recharge techniques: an adaptation to climate change. 2015. 366: p. 155-156. [Google Scholar]
  3. El Mezouary, L., Modélisation mathématique et numérique des phénomènes d’écoulements et de transport de pollutions dans les milieux poreux: application a l’aquifère alluvial de la rivière de Magra, Italie. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. El Mezouary, L., B. El Mansouri, and M. El Bouhaddioui. Groundwater forecasting using a numerical flow model coupled with machine learning model for synthetic time series. in Proceedings of the 4th Edition of International Conference on Geo-IT and Water Resources 2020, Geo-IT and Water Resources 2020. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. El Mezouary, L., et al., Modélisation numérique de la variation saisonnière de la qualité des eaux souterraines de l’aquifère de Magra, Italie. 2015(2): p. 25-31. [Google Scholar]
  6. El Mezouary, L., et al. Coupling of numerical flow model with the Susceptibility Index method (SI) to assess the groundwater vulnerability to pollution. in Proceedings of the 4th Edition of International Conference on Geo-IT and Water Resources 2020, Geo-IT and Water Resources 2020. 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. El Mezouary, L., et al., Stochastic modeling of flow in porous media by Monte Carlo simulation of permeability. 2016. 15. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sadiki, M.L., et al., Improvement of groundwater resources potential by artificial recharge technique: a case study of charf el Akab aquifer in the Tangier region, Morocco. 2019. 7(3): p. 224-236. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, J.Z., L.D. Zhang, and G.H.J.B.J. Yue, Fractal dimension in human cerebellum measured by magnetic resonance imaging. 2003. 85(6): p. 4041-4046. [Google Scholar]
  10. Deng, W.J.J.O.C.P., Numerical algorithm for the time fractional Fokker–Planck equation. 2007. 227(2): p. 1510-1522. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, Y.J.A.M. and Computation, A finite difference method for fractional partial differential equation. 2009. 215(2): p. 524-529. [Google Scholar]
  12. Yuste, S.B. and L.J.S.J.O.N.A. Acedo, An explicit finite difference method and a new von Neumanntype stability analysis for fractional diffusion equations. 2005. 42(5): p. 1862-1874. [Google Scholar]
  13. Podlubny, I., et al., Matrix approach to discrete fractional calculus II: partial fractional differential equations. 2009. 228(8): p. 3137-3153. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hanert, E.J.C. and Fluids, On the numerical solution of space–time fractional diffusion models. 2011. 46(1): p. 33-39. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lin, R., et al., Stability and convergence of a new explicit finite-difference approximation for the variable-order nonlinear fractional diffusion equation. 2009. 212(2): p. 435-445. [Google Scholar]
  16. Meerschaert, M.M., C.J.J.O.C. Tadjeran, and A. Mathematics, Finite difference approximations for fractional advection–dispersion flow equations. 2004. 172(1): p. 65-77. [Google Scholar]
  17. Crank, J. and P. Nicolson. A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type. in Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 1947. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.