EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 365 (2023) E3S Web of Conf., 365 (2023) 03029 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 365, 2023
IV International Scientific Conference “Construction Mechanics, Hydraulics and Water Resources Engineering” (CONMECHYDRO - 2022)
Article Number 03029
Number of page(s) 7
Section Hydraulics of Structures, Hydraulic Engineering and Land Reclamation Construction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202336503029
Published online 30 January 2023
  1. Experiments of dividing the stream, so as to increase its effects, and render less water sufficient. J. Franklin Inst. 6, (1828). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-0032(28)90418-4. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kroll, A.: Model test to keep a water intake free from bed load. (1977). [Google Scholar]
  3. Rubel, M.T., Soliman, H.M., Sims, G.E.: Phase distribution during steam-water flow in a horizontal T-junction. Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 14, (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(88)90020-1. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rubel, M.T., Soliman, H.M., Sims, G.E.: Phase distribution during steam-water flow in a horizontal T-junction. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. Work. 14, (1988). [Google Scholar]
  5. Neary, V.S., Sotiropoulos, F., Odgaard, A.J.: Predicting 3-D flows at lateral water intakes. In: Waterpower - Proceedings of the International Conference on Hydropower (1995). [Google Scholar]
  6. Qian, Y., Yang, Z., Xu, J.: Experimental study of phase separation in dividing two phase flow. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Heat Transf. Div. HTD. 334, (1996). [Google Scholar]
  7. Azzopardi, B.J., Rea, S.: Phase Separation Using a Simple T-junction. Presented at the (2000). https://doi.org/10.2118/63040-ms. [Google Scholar]
  8. Baker, D.B., Richards, R.P., Loftus, T.T., Kramer, J.W.: A new flashiness index: Characteristics and applications to Midwestern rivers and streams. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 40, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01046.x. [Google Scholar]
  9. McNeil, V.H., Cox, M.E., Preda, M.: Assessment of chemical water types and their spatial variation using multi-stage cluster analysis, Queensland, Australia. J. Hydrol. 310, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.12.014. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bertani, C., Malandrone, M., Panella, B.: Two-Phase Flow in a Horizontal T – Junction : Pressure Drop and. 5th Int. Conf. Heat Transf. Fluid Mech. Thermodyn. (2007). [Google Scholar]
  11. Cataldo, J.C.: Prediction of Transmission Losses in Ephemeral Streams, Western U.S.A. Open Hydrol. J. 4, (2010). https://doi.org/10.2174/1874378101004010019. [Google Scholar]
  12. Alamu, M.B., Azzopardi, B.J.: Flow pattern and slug dynamics around a flow splitter. J. Fluids Eng. Trans. ASME. 133, (2011). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4005196. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sawicki, J.M., Siebert, M.: Stream division by a channel bottom orifice. Arch. Hydroengineering Environ. Mech. 59, (2012). https://doi.org/10.2478/heem-2013-0005. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hubbart, J.A., Kellner, E., Freeman, G.: A case study considering the comparability of mass and volumetric suspended sediment data. Environ. Earth Sci. 71, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  15. Karami Moghadam, M., Shafai Bajestan, M., Sedghi, H., Seyedian, M.: An experimental and numerical study of flow patterns at a 30 degree water intake from trapezoidal and rectangular channels. Iran. J. Sci. Technol. - Trans. Civ. Eng. 38, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. Azimi, H., Shabanlou, S.: Numerical Simulation of Free Surface and Flow Field Turbulence in a Circular Channel with the Side Weir in Subcritical Flow. Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 18, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/ijnsns-2016-0115. [Google Scholar]
  17. Alcocer-García, H., Segovia-Hernández, J.G., Prado-Rubio, O.A., Sánchez-Ramírez, E., Quiroz-Ramírez, J.J.: Multi-objective optimization of intensified processes for the purification of levulinic acid involving economic and environmental objectives. Chem. Eng. Process. - Process Intensif. 136, (2019). [Google Scholar]
  18. Azimi, H., Shabanlou, S.: The Effect of Froude Number on Flow Field of U-Shaped Channel Along a Side Weir in Supercritical Flow Regime. Comput. Math. Model. 30, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10598-019-09452-z. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dhanusree, M., Bhaskaran, G.: GIS-Based Approach in Drainage Morphometric Analysis of Bharathapuzha River Basin, India. J. Geogr. Environ. Earth Sci. Int. (2019). https://doi.org/10.9734/jgeesi/2019/v20i130097. [Google Scholar]
  20. Montaseri, H., Asiaei, H., Baghlani, A., Omidvar, P.: Numerical study of flow pattern around lateral intake in a curved channel. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C. 30, (2019). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183119500839. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Calle, M., Calle, J., Alho, P., Benito, G.: Inferring sediment transfers and functional connectivity of rivers from repeat topographic surveys. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms. 45, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4765. [Google Scholar]
  22. Shaazizov, F., Badalov, A., Ergashev, A., Shukurov, D.: Studies of rational methods of water selection in water intake areas of hydroelectric power plants. In: E3S Web of Conferences (2019). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199705041. [Google Scholar]
  23. Shaazizov, F., Shukurov, D.: Physical modeling of the filtration process through the dam base. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/869/7/072037. [Google Scholar]
  24. Shaazizov, F.: The flow Confluence of river systems of the Pskem and Koksu river basins. In: E3S Web of Conferences (2021). [Google Scholar]
  25. Shaazizov, F.: Studies of turbulent flow characteristics of dividing open water streams. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2021). [Google Scholar]
  26. Shaazizov, F.: Assessment of damage during the formation and passage of mudflows in the Tashkent region. In: E3S Web of Conferences (2021). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202126403042. [Google Scholar]
  27. Shaazizov, F., Shukurov, D., Shukurov, E.: System for ensuring the detection and elimination of fires in the building of the hydroelectric power station. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2021). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.