Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 426, 2023
The 5th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2023)
Article Number 01016
Number of page(s) 8
Section Integrated Sustainable Science and Technology Innovation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342601016
Published online 15 September 2023
  1. Rezaee, A. A., Zahedi, M. H., & Dehghan, Z. (2019). Coverage optimization in wireless sensor networks using gravitational search algorithm. Journal of Soft Computing and Information Technology, 8(3), 20-31. [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019). Integrating technology acceptance model with innovation diffusion theory: An empirical investigation on students’ intention to use E-learning systems. Ieee Access, 7, 26797- 26809. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, J., Wang, F. Y., Wang, K., Lin, W. H., Xu, X., & Chen, C. (2011). Data-driven intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 12(4), 1624-1639. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berawi, M. A., Suwartha, N., Kusrini, E., Yuwono, A. H., Harwahyu, R., Setiawan, E. A., ... & Whulanza, Y. (2020). Tackling the COVID-19 pandemic: Managing the cause, spread, and impact. International journal of technology, 11(2), 209-214. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Asvial, M., Mayangsari, J., & Yudistriansyah, A. (2021). Behavioral intention of e-learning: A case study of distance learning at a junior high school in Indonesia due to the covid-19 pandemic. International journal of technology, 12(1), 54-64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Almaiah, M. A., & Al Mulhem, A. (2019). Analysis of the essential factors affecting of intention to use of mobile learning applications: A comparison between universities adopters and non-adopters. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 1433-1468. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Alzahrani, A. I., Alfarraj, O., Saged, A. A., & Rahman, N. S. A. (2018). Use of e-learning by university students in Malaysian higher educational institutions: A case in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Ieee Access, 6, 14268-14276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Salloum, S. A., Alhamad, A. Q. M., Al-Emran, M., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Exploring students’ acceptance of e-learning through the development of a comprehensive technology acceptance model. IEEE access, 7, 128445-128462. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Al-Rahmi, W. M., Yahaya, N., Aldraiweesh, A. A., Alamri, M. M., Aljarboa, N. A., Alturki, U., & Aljeraiwi, A. A. (2019). Integrating technology acceptance model with innovation diffusion theory: An empirical investigation on students’ intention to use E-learning systems. Ieee Access, 7, 26797-26809. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dachyar, M., & Dewi, F. (2015, May). Improving university ranking to achieve university competitiveness by management information system. In IOP conference series: Materials science and engineering (Vol. 83, No. 1, p. 012023). IOP Publishing. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Usta, E. (2011). The effect of web-based learning environments on attitudes of students regarding computer and internet. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.051 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Niederst Robbins, J. (2012). Learning Web Design, Fourth Edition. www.wowebook.com [Google Scholar]
  13. Arsyad, A. (2019). Media Pembelajaran (21st ed.). Rajawali Pers. http://katalogarpusdabrebes.perpusnas.go.id/detail- opac?id=17681 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bates, A. and Poole, G. (2003). Effective Teaching with Technology in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. [Google Scholar]
  15. Azhari. (2015). Penerapan model pembelajaran discovery learning terhadap peningkatan hasil belajar siswa kelas XI-IPA1 pada materi sistem pernapasan di SMA Negeri Unggul Sigli. Jurnal Biologi Edukasi, 7(1), 13–21. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JBE/article/download/5487/4605 [Google Scholar]
  16. Bates, A. T. (2015). Teaching in a Digital Age Teaching in a Digital Age. Creative Commons Attributions Non-Commercial .... http://solr.bccampus.ca:8001/bcc/items/6e34af22-19b4-4271-9337-8ee1160d85ec/1/?attachment.uuid=ede11f4f-4f5d-42e9-a70d-5d5f038262c0 [Google Scholar]
  17. Suartini, T. (2019). Influence Application of Learning Model on Vocational Education Based on Quality Issurance. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019851552 [Google Scholar]
  18. Harasim, L. (2017). Learning Theory and Online Technologies (2nd Editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716831. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Wulandari, S.S, Puspasari, D.,& Puspita, R.O (2022). Development of Interactive Multimedia Based Teaching Materials for Distance Learning During the Covid 19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, 32(2), 280-295 [Google Scholar]
  20. Juhana, O., & Suratman, M. (2000). Menggambar Teknik Mesin. Pustaka Grafika. [Google Scholar]
  21. Khusniyah, N. L., & Hakim, L. (2019). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Berbasis Daring: Sebuah Bukti Pada Pembelajaran [Google Scholar]
  22. Grabowski, S. (2003). Teaching & Media: A Systematic Approach The Gerlach & Ely Model. [Google Scholar]
  23. Brinkerhoff, D. A. (2001). Survey of instructional development models, third edition. In TechTrends (Vol. 45, Issue 1, pp. 48–50). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02763388 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ryan, T. G., & Gottfried, J. (2012). Elementary supervision and the supervisor: Teacher attitudes and inclusive education. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 563–571. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sadiman, A. . (2012). Media Pendidikan. PT Raja [Google Scholar]
  26. Harasim, L. (2017). Learning theory and online technologies. Routledge. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.