Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 440, 2023
International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023)
Article Number 05003
Number of page(s) 15
Section Smart Education University Learning Environment
Published online 01 November 2023
  1. M. A. Almaiah, A. Al-Khasawneh, and A. Althunibat, “Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 5261–5280, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. K. Butola, “E-learning-a new trend of learning in 21st century during COVID-19 pandemic,” Indian J. Forensic Med. Toxicol., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 422–426, 2021, doi: 10.37506/ijfmt.v15i1.13443. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. A. Hamid, D. Aditama, E. Permata, N. Kholifah, M. Nurtanto, and N. W. A. Majid, “Simulating the COVID-19 epidemic event and its prevention measures using python programming,” Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 278–288, 2022, doi: 10.11591/ijeecs.v26.i1.pp278-288. [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Stuchlikova, “Challenges of education in the 21st century,” ICETA 2016 - 14th IEEE Int. Conf. Emerg. eLearning Technol. Appl. Proc., pp. 335–340, 2016, doi: 10.1109/ICETA.2016.7802072. [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. A. L. A. Jawad and B. Shalash, “The impact of e-learning strategy on students’ academic achievement case study: Al-quds open university,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 44–53, 2020, doi: 10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. K. Scott, A. Morris, and B. Marais, “Medical student use of digital learning resources,” Clin. Teach., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 29–33, 2018, doi: 10.1111/tct.12630. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Shrivastava and P. Shrivastava, “Assessing the impact of e-learning in medical education,” Int. J. Acad. Med., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 40–42, 2020, doi: 10.4103/IJAM.IJAM_5_19. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. K. Shah and L. A. Barkas, “Analysing the impact of e-learning technology on students’ engagement, attendance and performance,” Res. Learn. Technol., vol. 26, 2018, doi: 10.25304/rlt.v26.2070. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Z. Wali and A. W. Popal, “The emerging issues and impacts of technology in classroom learning,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 15, no. 15, pp. 237–245, 2020, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v15i15.14175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. E. T. Osman, “Global impact of COVID-19 on education systems: the emergency remote teaching at Sultan Qaboos University,” J. Educ. Teach., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 463–471, 2020, doi: 10.1080/02607476.2020.1802583. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. A. Alharbi et al., “Identification of critical factors affecting the students’ acceptance of Learning Management System (LMS) in Saudi Arabia,” Int. J. Innov., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 353–388, 2021, doi: 10.5585/iji.v9i2.19652. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Wichadee, “Factors related to faculty members’ attitude and adoption of a learning management system,” Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 53–61, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. N. Fathema and K. Sutton, “Factors Influencing Faculty Members’ Learning Management Systems Adoption Behavior: An Analysis Using The Technology Acceptance Model,” Int. J. Trends Econ. Manag. Technol., vol. II, no. VI, pp. 20–28, 2013, doi: EISSN: 2321-5518. [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Bousbahi and M. S. Alrazgan, “Investigating IT Faculty Resistance to Learning Management System Adoption Using Latent Variables in an Acceptance Technology Model,” Sci. World J., vol. 2015, pp. 1–11, 2015, doi: 10.1155/2015/375651. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. CHED, “CHED memorandum order N0. 04, Serieis of 2020. Guidelines on the implementation of flexible learning.,” 2020, [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  16. Davis; Fred D., “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Q., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. J. E. Pelet, “E-learning 2.0 technologies and web applications in higher education,” E-Learning 2.0 Technol. Web Appl. High. Educ., pp. 1–395, 2015, doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4876-0. [Google Scholar]
  18. G. Y. Washington, “The Learning Management System Matters in Face-to-Face Higher Education Courses,” J. Educ. Technol. Syst., vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 255–275, 2019, doi: 10.1177/0047239519874037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. U. Alturki and A. Aldraiweesh, “Application of learning management system (Lms) during the covid-19 pandemic: A sustainable acceptance model of the expansion technology approach,” Sustain., vol. 13, no. 19, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su131910991. [Google Scholar]
  20. B. Arsovic and N. Stefanovic, “E-learning based on the adaptive learning model: case study in Serbia,” Sadhana - Acad. Proc. Eng. Sci., vol. 45, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12046-020-01499-8. [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Jung and J. H. Huh, “An efficient LMS platform and its test bed,” Electron., vol. 8, no. 2, 2019, doi: 10.3390/electronics8020154. [Google Scholar]
  22. V. M. Bradley, “Learning Management System (LMS) Use with Online Instruction,” Int. J. Technol. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 68, 2020, doi: 10.46328/ijte.36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. N. Zanjani, S. L. Edwards, S. Nykvist, and S. Geva, “LMS Acceptance: The Instructor Role,” Asia-Pacific Educ. Res., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 519–526, 2016, doi: 10.1007/s40299-016-0277-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D. S. Walker, J. R. Lindner, T. P. Murphrey, and K. Dooley, “Learning Management System Usage: Perspectives From University Instructors,” Q. Rev. Distance Educ., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 41–50, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Anshari, Y. Alas, and L. S. Guan, “Pervasive knowledge, social networks, and cloud computing: E-learning 2.0,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 909–921, 2015, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1360a. [Google Scholar]
  26. H. Dhika, F. Destiawati, M. Sonny, Surajiyo, and M. Jaya, “Comparison of Learning Management System Moodle, Edmodo and Jejak Bali,” 2020, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.200323.097. [Google Scholar]
  27. S. Devi and M. Aparna, “Moodle-An Effective Learning Management System for 21 st Century Learners,” Alochana Chakra J., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 4474–4485, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  28. W. D. N. S. M. Tennakoon and W. J. A. J. M. Lasanthika, “Evaluating E-Learning Systems Success: A Case of Sri Lanka,” Wayamba J. Manag., vol. 12, no. 1, p. 59, 2021, doi: 10.4038/wjm.v12i1.7516. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Jabbar and M. Hasmy, “Effective use of collaboration tools in Moodle LMS by Lecturers and Students at South Eastern University of Sri Lanka,” J. Inf. Syst. Inf. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2478–0677, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  30. R. M. L. Fernandez and M. L. V. Sandagon, “Adoption of Moodle Learning Management System: The case of selected Philippine universities,” Asia Pacific J. Educ. Arts Sci., 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. J. O. P. Brioso, “An E-classroom Management System Implementation: Contextualization, Perception, and Usability,” Rev. Integr. Bus. Econ. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 229–249, 2017, [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  32. M. B. Garcia, “E-Learning Technology Adoption in the Philippines: An Investigation of Factors Affecting Filipino College Students’ Acceptance of Learning Management Systems,” Int. J. E-Learning Educ. Technol. Digit. Media, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 118–130, 2017, doi: 10.17781/p002374. [Google Scholar]
  33. J. J. B. Joaquin, H. T. Biana, and M. A. Dacela, “The Philippine Higher Education Sector in the Time of COVID-19,” Front. Educ., vol. 5, 2020, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2020.576371. [Google Scholar]
  34. J. G. Garcia, M. G. T. Gangan, M. N. Tolentino, M. Ligas, S. D. Moraga, and A. A. Pasilan, “Canvas Adoption Assessment and Acceptance of the Learning Management System on a Web-Based Platform,” arXiv Comput. Soc., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 24–38, 2021, [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  35. J. S. Barrot, I. I. Llenares, and L. S. del Rosario, “Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 7321–7338, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10589-x. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. B. Soledad Fabito, R. L. Rodriguez, A. O. Trillanes, J. I. G. Lira, D. Z. Estocada, and P. M. Q. Sta Ana, “Investigating the Factors influencing the Use of a Learning Management System (LMS): An Extended Information System Success Model (ISSM),” ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Ser., pp. 42–46, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3421682.3421687. [Google Scholar]
  37. J. T. Amora and M. R. Fearnley, “Learning management system adoption in higher education using the extended technology acceptance model,” IAFOR J. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 89–106, 2020, doi: 10.22492/ije.8.2.05. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. F. T. Dayagbil, D. R. Palompon, L. L. Garcia, and M. M. J. Olvido, “Teaching and Learning Continuity Amid and Beyond the Pandemic,” Front. Educ., vol. 6, 2021, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.678692. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. J. Zuniga-Tonio, “Google Classroom as a Tool of Support for Flexible Learning in the New Normal,” J. Educ. Manag. Dev. Stud., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 25–39, 2021, doi: 10.52631/jemds.v1i2.20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. S. Chatterjee and A. Kumar Kar, “Why do small and medium enterprises use social media marketing and what is the impact: Empirical insights from India,” Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 53, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. S. Chatterjee, A. K. Kar, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Intention to Use IoT by Aged Indian Consumers,” J. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 655–666, 2022, doi: 10.1080/08874417.2021.1873080. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hamed Taherdoost, “A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories,” Procedia Manuf., 2018, [Online]. Available: [Google Scholar]
  43. M. S. Chhonker, D. Verma, A. K. Kar, and P. Grover, “m-commerce technology adoption: Thematic and citation analysis of scholarly research during (2008-2017),” Bottom Line, vol. 31, no. 3–4, pp. 208–233, 2018, doi: 10.1108/BL-04-2018-0020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Y. Jadil, N. P. Rana, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Understanding the drivers of online trust and intention to buy on a website: An emerging market perspective,” Int. J. Inf. Manag. Data Insights, vol. 2, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100065. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.