EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 544 (2024) E3S Web of Conf., 544 (2024) 01016 References
Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 544, 2024
8th International Symposium on Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials (IS-Porto 2023)
Article Number 01016
Number of page(s) 8
Section Experimental Investigations From Very Small Strains to Beyond Failure - Advances in Laboratory Testing Techniques (Equipment and Procedures)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202454401016
Published online 02 July 2024
  1. Akgun, H., Turkmenoğlu, A. G., Met, İ., Yal, G. P., and Kockar, M. K. 2017. “The use of Ankara Clay as a compacted clay liner for landfill sites”, Clay Minerals, 52(3), 391–412 https://doi.org/10.1180/claymin.2017.052.3.08 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alyousif, M. “Development of computer-controlled triaxial test setup and study on multistage triaxial test on sand”. Middle East Technical University. M.Sc. thesis. 2015 [Google Scholar]
  3. ASTM D2435-04 “Standard Test Methods for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils”. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2435-04.2 [Google Scholar]
  4. ASTM D2487 – 17 “Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System)”). ASTM International. 04. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-17E01.2 [Google Scholar]
  5. ASTM D4318-17 “Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils”. Report, 04(March 2010). 2017. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4318-17E01 [Google Scholar]
  6. ASTM D4767-11 “Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive Soils”. Astm, 04(January). 2011. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4767-11R20.2 [Google Scholar]
  7. ASTM D6913-17 “Standard Test Methods for Particle – Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis”. ASTM D6913–04, 04(200), 20–23. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1520/D6913-04R09E01.2 [Google Scholar]
  8. ASTM D7181-20 “Standard test method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils”. ASTM International. 2020. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1520/D718120.of [Google Scholar]
  9. ASTM D7928-17 “Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation) of Fine-Grained Soils Using the Sedimentation (Hydrometer) Analysis”. ASTM D7928–17, 1–25. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7928-17 [Google Scholar]
  10. Avsar, E., Ulusay, R., and Erguler, Z. A. 2005. “Swelling properties of Ankara (Turkey) clay with carbonate concretions”. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience, 11(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.2113/11.1.73 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Avsar, E., Ulusay, R., and Sonmez, H. 2009. “Assessments of swelling anisotropy of Ankara clay”. Engineering Geology, 105(1–2), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.12.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Banerjee, A., Puppala, A. J., and Hoyos, L. R. 2020. “Suctioncontrolled multistage triaxial testing on clayey silty soil”. Engineering Geology, 265(September 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105409 [Google Scholar]
  13. Binal, A., Bas, B., and Karamut, O. R. 2016. “Improvement of the Strength of Ankara Clay with Self-cementing High Alkaline Fly Ash”. Procedia Engineering, 161, 374–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.577 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Budhu, M. “Soil Mechanics Fundamentals”, first edition, John Wiley and Sons, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  15. Choi, J. H., Dai, S., Lin, J. S., and Seol, Y. 2018. “Multistage Triaxial Tests on Laboratory-Formed Methane Hydrate-Bearing Sediments”. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 123(5), 3347–3357. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB015525 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cokca, E., and Tilgen, H. P. 2010. “Shear strength-suction relationship of compacted Ankara clay”. Applied Clay Science, 49(4), 400–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2009.08.028 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. De Beer, I. E. E. De. 1950. “THE CELL-TEST”. 162–172. [Google Scholar]
  18. Erguler, Z. A., and Ulusay, R. 2003. “Engineering characteristics and environmental impacts of the expansive Ankara Clay, and swelling maps for SW and central parts of the Ankara (Turkey) metropolitan area”. Environmental Geology, 44(8), 979–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-003-0841-y [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grasle, W. 2011. “Multistep triaxial strength tests: Investigating strength parameters and pore pressure effects on Opalinus Clay”. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 36(17–18), 1898–1904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.024 [Google Scholar]
  20. Head, K. H.. “Manual of soil laboratory testing”, volume 2. “Permeability, shear strength and compressibility tests”.1982.https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7061(95)90001-2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Henkel, D. J., and Gilbert, G. D. 1952. “The effect of the rubber membrane on the measured triaxial compression strength of clay samples”. Geotechnique, 3(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1952.3.1.20 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ho, D. Y. F., and Fredlund, D. G. 1987. “A multistage triaxial test for unsaturated soils”. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 5(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ10795J [Google Scholar]
  23. Hormdee, D., Kaikeerati, N., and Angsuwotai, P. 2012. “Evaluation on the results of multistage shear test”. International Journal of GEOMATE, 2(1), 140–143. https://doi.org/10.21660/2012.3.3m [Google Scholar]
  24. Kayaturk, D., Bol, E., Sert, S., and Ozocak, A. 2021. “Determination of Shear Strength Parameters by Multistage Triaxial Tests in the Long-Term Analysis of Slopes”. Academic Platform Journal of Natural Hazards and Disaster Management, 2(1), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.52114/apjhad.948154 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kenny, T. C., and Watson, G. H. 1961. “Multiple-Stage Triaxial Test for Determining c’ and f’ of Saturated Soils”. National Research Council of Canada. Division of Building Research, 72–2. [Google Scholar]
  26. Khosravi, A., Alsherif, N., Lynch, C., and McCartney, J. 2012. “Multistage triaxial testing to estimate effective stress relationships for unsaturated compacted soils”. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 35(1), 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103624 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim, M. M., and Ko, H. Y. 1979. “Multistage Triaxial Testing of Rocks”. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 2(2), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj10435j [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mishra, B., and Verma, P. 2015. “Uniaxial and triaxial single and multistage creep tests on coal-measure shale rocks”. International Journal of Coal Geology, 137, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2014.11.005 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mustafa, E. I. 2011. “A laboratory study of anisotropy in engineering properties of Ankara clay”. September, 94. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34621.87528 [Google Scholar]
  30. Nambiar, M. R. M., Venkatappa Rao, G., and Gulhati, S. K. 1985. “Multistage Triaxial Testing: a Rational Procedure”. ASTM Special Technical Publication, 274–293. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp36340s [Google Scholar]
  31. Ravi Sharma, M. S., Baxter, C. D. P., Moran, K., Vaziri, H., and Narayanasamy, R. 2011. “Strength of Weakly Cemented Sands from Drained Multistage Triaxial Tests”. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137(12), 1202–1210. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000537 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Reis Ferreira, S. M., Correia, A. G., and Roque, A. J. 2016. “Strength of Non-traditional Granular Materials Assessed from Drained Multistage Triaxial Tests”. Procedia Engineering, 143(Ictg), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.009 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rivera-Hernandez, X. A., Vahedifard, F., and Ellithy, G. S. 2021. “Effect of suction and confining pressure on shear strength and dilatancy of highly compacted silty sand: Single-Stage versus Multistage Triaxial Testing”. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 44(2), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20190437 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Saeedy, H., and Mollah, M. 1988. “Application of Multistage Triaxial Test to Kuwaiti Soils”. Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, 363-363-13. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp29087s [Google Scholar]
  35. Shahin, M. A., and Cargeeg, A. 2011. “Experimental investigation into multistage versus conventional triaxial compression tests for a c-phi soil”. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 90–93, 28–32. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.90-93.28 [Google Scholar]
  36. Skempton, A. W. 1954. “The pore-pressure coefficients a and b”. Geotechnique, 4(4), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1954.4.4.143 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Soranzo, M. 1988. “Results and Interpretation of Multistage Triaxial Compression Tests”. Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, 353-353-10. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp29086s [Google Scholar]
  38. T.Willian Lambe and Robert V whitman. 1969. Kupdf.Net_Lambe-Whitman-Soil-Mechanicspdf. In T.William Lambe. [Google Scholar]
  39. Taheri, A., Sasaki, Y., Tatsuoka, F., and Watanabe, K. 2012. “Strength and deformation characteristics of cement-mixed gravelly soil in multiple-step triaxial compression”. Soils and Foundations, 52(1), 126–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2012.01.015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Taylor, D. W. 1948. “Fundamentals of soil mechanics”. In Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–94-017–9460-2__4 [Google Scholar]
  41. Vergara, M. R., Kudella, P., and Triantafyllidis, T. 2015. “Large Scale Tests on Jointed and Bedded Rocks Under Multi-Stage Triaxial Compression and Direct Shear”. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 48(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-013-0541-1 [Google Scholar]
  42. Wild, K. M., Barla, M., Turinetti, G., and Amann, F. 2017. “A multi-stage triaxial testing procedure for low permeable geomaterials applied to Opalinus Clay”. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 9(3), 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2017.04.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.