Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 205, 2020
2nd International Conference on Energy Geotechnics (ICEGT 2020)
Article Number 12007
Number of page(s) 6
Section Minisymposium: Low Carbon Geotechnical Engineering (organized by Alessandro Tarantino, Enrique Romero, and Alessio Ferrari)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020512007
Published online 18 November 2020
  1. H.G. Poulos, Marine Geotechnics (Spon Press, 1988). [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Randolph, S. Gourvenec, Offshore Geotechnical Engineering (CRC Press, 2011). [Google Scholar]
  3. G. Spagnoli, P. Doherty, D. Bellato, L. Weixler, Latest technological developments in offshore deep mixing for piled Oil and Gas platforms. ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, June 8–13, 2014, San Francisco, California, USA. Volume 3, V003T10A001, https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2014-23045. [Google Scholar]
  4. B.C. Chattopadhyay, P.J. Pise, J. Geotech. Eng. 112, 9 (1986) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Gavin, D. Igoe, P. Doherty, P.I. Civil Eng. Geotec. 164, 4 (2011), [Google Scholar]
  6. E. Oguz, D. Clelland, A.H. Day, A. Incecik, J. López Amate, G. Sanchez, G. Gonzalez Almeria, Ocean Eng. 147 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. B. Byrne, G. Houlsby, Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A, 373 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Davidson, T. Al-Baghdadi, M.J. Brown, J. Knappett, A. Brennan, C.E. Augarde, L. Wang, W.M. Coombs, D. Richards, A. Blake, J. Ball, Centrifuge modelling of screw piles for offshore wind energy foundations. Physical modelling in geotechnics: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (ICPMG 2018), July 17-20, 2018, London, United Kingdom. Volume 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 695-700. [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Cerfontaine, J.A. Knappett, M.J. Brown, C. Davidson, Y. Sharif, Screw pile design optimisation under tension in sand. Proceedings of the XVII European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Rykjavik 1-6 September 2019, doi: 10.32075/17ECSMGE-2019-0696. [Google Scholar]
  10. G. Spagnoli, Mar. Georesour. Geotech. 35, 4 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. Arup Geotechnics, Design of screw piles (2005) [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Spagnoli, Soil Mech. Found. Eng. 50, 3 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  13. C.H.C. Tsuha, N. Aoki, Can. Geotech. J. 47, 6 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  14. G. Spagnoli, K. Gavin, Helical Piles as a Novel Foundation System for Offshore Piled Facilities. Proceedings of the Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, 9-12 November, Abu Dhabi, UAE, https://doi.org/10.2118/177604-MS (2015) [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Spagnoli, K. Gavin, C. Brangan, In situ and laboratory tests in dense sand investigating the helix-to-shaft ratio of helical piles as a novel offshore foundation system. Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics III, Meyer, V. (Editor), Taylor & Francis Group, London, 643-648 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. A.M.A. Fateh, A. Eslami, A. Fahimifar, Mar. Georesour. Geotech. 35, 2 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. G. Spagnoli, C.H.C. Tsuha, Mar. Georesour. Geotech. 38, 9, (2020) https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2020.1729905 [Google Scholar]
  18. B. Livneh, M.H.M. Naggar, Can. Geotech. J. 45, 8 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. G. Spagnoli, C.H.C. Tsuha, P. Oreste, C.M. Mendez Solarte, J. Waterw. Port C.-ASCE 144, 6 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Spagnoli, C.H.C. Tsuha, P. Oreste, C.M. Mendez Solarte, DFI J 12, 3 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  21. R.M. Hoyt, S.P. Clemence, Uplift Capacity of Helical Anchors in Soil. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (1989). [Google Scholar]
  22. CFEM, Canadian Foundation Engineering Manual. 4th Edition. Canadian Geotechnical Society, Technical Committee on Foundations, BiTech Publishers Ltd (2006) [Google Scholar]
  23. Z.Z. Mosquera, C.H.C. Tsuha, A.T. Beck, Serviceability performance evaluation of helical piles under uplift loading. J. Perfom. Constr. Fac. 30, 4 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Tadashi, F. Mikio, A study of end-bear capacity mechanism of steel spiral pile. Deep Foundation on Bored and Auger Piles, 161-166 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  25. A. Ghaly, A. Hanna, Can. Geotech. J. 28, 3, (1991) [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Sakr, J. Perfom. Constr. Fac. 29, 6 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  27. K. Gavin, P. Doherty, A. Tolooiyan, Can. Geotech. 51, 11 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Al-Baghdadi, M.J. Brown, C. Davidson, J. Knappett, A. Brennan, L. Wang, W.M. Coombs, C.W. Augarde, D. Richards, A. Blake, CPT-based design procedure for installation torque prediction for screw piles installed in sand.’, in Offshore site investigation and geotechnics: integrated geotechnologies - present and future: proceedings of the 8th international conference, held 12–14 September 2017 at the Royal Geographical Society, London. London: Society for Underwater Technology, pp. 346-353 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. G. Spagnoli, C.M. Mendez Solarte, C.H.C. Tsuha, P. Oreste, Int. J. Geotech. Eng. 14, 5 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2018.1452362 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. A.B. Chance. Guide to Model Specification CHANCE® Civil Construction: Helical Piles for Structural Support. Bulletin 01-0303. Shelton: Hubbell Inc. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  31. B.M. Lehane, J.A. Schneider, X. Xu, The UWA-05 method for prediction of axial capacity of driven piles in sand. In Frontiers in Offshore Geotechnics. Edited by M. Cassidy and S. Gourvenec, Taylor & Francis Group, London, 683-688 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  32. G. Spagnoli, C.H.C. Tsuha, P. Oreste, P., C.M. Mendez Solarte. J. Waterway Port Coast 144, 6, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  33. Sakr, M., Bartlett, F. High capacity helical piles–a new dimension for bridge foundations. In Proceedings of 8th international conference on short and medium span bridges, Niagara Falls, Canada. (2010). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.