Open Access
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 245, 2021
2021 5th International Conference on Advances in Energy, Environment and Chemical Science (AEECS 2021)
Article Number 01018
Number of page(s) 9
Section Energy Development and Utilization and Energy-Saving Technology Application
Published online 24 March 2021
  1. What is carbon neutrality and how can it be achieved by 2050? | News | European Parliament. 2019–03–10 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. Carbon-Neutral Is Hip, but Is It Green?. The New York Times, published 2007–04–29, accessed 2007–08–03. [Google Scholar]
  3. Sutter, John D.; Berlinger, Joshua. Final draft of climate deal formally accepted in Paris. CNN. Cable News Network, Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. (2015–12–12) [Google Scholar]
  4. Adoption of the Paris agreement-by the President-Draft decision -/CP.21. UNFCCC. 2015–12–12. Archived from the original on 2015–12–12 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  5. Paris Agreement, FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1. UNFCCC secretariat. Archived from the original on 12 December 2015 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  6. Kaufman, Mark. The devious fossil fuel propaganda we all use. Mashable, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  7. Bui, Mai; Adjiman, Claire S.; Bardow, André; et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy & Environmental Science. 11(5): 1062–1176. doi:10.1039/C7EE02342A. [Google Scholar]
  8. Statistical Review of World Energy. [Google Scholar]
  9. J.F. Manwell, J.G. McGowan, and A.L. Rogers. Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design and Application (2nd ed), John Wiley & Sons: Chichester (2009). [Google Scholar]
  10. Tony Burton et al., (ed), Wind Energy Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0471489972, page 65. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wind energy Frequently Asked Questions. British Wind Energy Association. Archived from the original on 19 April 2006 (2006) [Google Scholar]
  12. What are the pros and cons of onshore wind energy? Grantham Research Institute on climate change and the environment (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). [Google Scholar]
  14. [Google Scholar]
  15. J.C. Wilson. Offshore wind farms: their impacts, and potential habitat gains as artificial reefs, in particular for fish, University of Hull, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  16. Rühle, Sven (2016–02–08). Tabulated Values of the Shockley-Queisser Limit for Single Junction Solar Cells. Solar Energy. 130: 139–147. Bibcode: 2016SoEn..130..139R. doi:10.1016/j.solener (2016) [Google Scholar]
  17. Goetzberger A. Solar cells: past, present, future. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 2002;74(1–4):1-11. https://10.1016/10.1016/S0927–0248(02)00042–9. [Google Scholar]
  18. Goetzberger A, Hebling C, Schock H-W. Photovoltaic materials, history, status and outlook. Mater Sci Eng R Reports, 40(1):1-46. https://10.1016/10.1016/S0927–796X(02)00092-X (2003) [Google Scholar]
  19. [Google Scholar]
  20. Guerrero-Lemus R, Martínez-Duart J. Concentrated solar power. Renew Energies CO2 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  21. Gee JM, Schubert WK, Basore PA. Emitter wrap-through solar cell, 265–270 (1993) [Google Scholar]
  22. Shah A, Torres P, Tscharner R, Wyrsch N, Keppner H. Photovoltaic technology: the case for thin-film solar cells. Science, 285(5428):692–698. https://10.1126/science.285.5428.692 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  23. Cadmium telluride department of energy. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  24. Spanggaard H, Krebs FC. A brief history of the development of organic and polymeric photovoltaics. Sol Energ Mat Sol C, 83(2–3):125–146 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  25. American Chemical Society. Chemical and engineering news: “news edition” of the American Chemical Society. The American Chemical Society (1942) [Google Scholar]
  26. McMeekin DP, Sadoughi G, Rehman W, et al. A mixed-cationlead mixed-halide perovskite absorber for tandem solar cells. Science(80-). 351(6269):151–155. https://10.1016/10.1126/science.aad5845 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  27. Grätzel M. Dye-sensitized solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol C; 4(2):145–153. https://10.1016/10.1016/S1389–5567(03)00026–1 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  28. Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR). BINE Informationsdienst: Themeninfo: Solarthermische Kraftwerke-Parabolic trough collector technology. [Google Scholar]
  29. Concentrating Solar Power Projects in the United States, 17 February 2014. [Google Scholar]
  30. Müller-Steinhagen H, Trieb F. Concentrating solar power: areview of the technology. Ingenia, (18):43–50. https://10.1016/10.1126/science.1168539 (2004) [Google Scholar]
  31. Renewable Energy Agency I. Renewable energy cost analysis: concentrating solar power (2012) [Google Scholar]
  32. Three solar modules of world's first commercial beam-down tower Concentrated Solar Power project to be connected to grid (2019) [Google Scholar]
  33. Heath GA, Burkhardt Iii JJ. Meta -analysis of estimates of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from concentrating solar power preprint meta-analysis of estimates of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from concentrating solar power. PIX. 2011;16560. [Google Scholar]
  34. Prakash R, Bhat IK. Energy, economics and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 13(9):2716–2721 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  35. Timilsina GR, Kurdgelashvili L, Narbel PA. Solar energy: markets, economics and policies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16(1):449-465. https://10.1016/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.009 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  36. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cleveland, Cutler J.; Morris, Christopher G. Handbook of Energy: Chronologies, Top Ten Lists, and Word Clouds. Elsevier Science. p. 44. ISBN 978–0–12–417019–3 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  38. Hydroelectric facility. [Google Scholar]
  39. Variable Speed Is Key To World's Biggest Pumped Hydro Energy Storage Project, China’s Fengning Plant (2020) [Google Scholar]
  40. TVA-Raccoon Mountain. Tennessee Valley Authority. Retrieved 3 April 2018. [Google Scholar]
  41. Raghunath, H.M. Hydrology: principles, analysis, and design (Rev. 2nd ed.). New Delhi: New Age International. p. 288. ISBN 81–224–1825–2 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  42. Douglas T, Broomhall P, Orr C. Run-of-the-River Hydropower in BC: A Citizen’s Guide to Understanding Approvals, Impacts and Sustainability of Independent Power Projects Archived 2008–08–28 at the Wayback Machine. Watershed Watch (2007) [Google Scholar]
  43. [Google Scholar]
  44. DiCerto, JJ. The Electric Wishing Well: The Solution to the Energy Crisis. New York: Macmillan (1976) [Google Scholar]
  45. Turcotte, D. L.; Schubert, G. Geodynamics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 136–137. ISBN 978–0–521–66624–4 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  46. Rui Li, Zhizhou Du, Jiagang Yang. Current Status and Prospects of China’s Hydropower Development. Water Science and Engineering Technology, 38(06), Page 73–78 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  47. Bui, Mai; Adjiman, Claire S.; Bardow, André. et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): the way forward. Energy & Environmental Science, 11(5): 1062–1176. doi:10.1039/C7EE02342A. ISSN 1754–5692. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bryngelsson, Mårten; Westermark, Mats. Feasibility study of CO2 removal from pressurized flue gas in a fully fired combined cycle: the Sargas project. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems. pp. 703–10 (2005) [Google Scholar]
  49. Sumida, Kenji; Rogow, David L.; Mason, Jarad A. et al. Carbon Dioxide Capture in Metal–Organic Frameworks. Chemical Reviews, 112(2): 724–781. doi:10.1021/cr2003272. PMID 22204561. [Google Scholar]
  50. Chazdon, Robin; Brancalion, Pedro. Restoring forests as a means to many ends. Science. 365(6448): 24–25. Bibcode: Sci.365.24C. doi:10.1126/science.aax9539. PMID 31273109. S2CID 195804244 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  51. Blakemore, R.J. Non-flat Earth Recalibrated for Terrain and Topsoil. Soil Systems. 2(4): 64. doi:10.3390/soilsystems2040064. [Google Scholar]
  52. Aydin, Gokhan; Karakurt, Izzet; Aydiner, Kerim. Evaluation of geologic storage options of CO2: Applicability, cost, storage capacity and safety. Energy Policy. Special Section on Carbon Emissions and Carbon Management in Cities with Regular Papers. 38(9): 5072–5080. doi:10.1016/j.enpol (2010) [Google Scholar]
  53. Kheshgi, H.S.. Sequestering atmospheric carbon dioxide by increasing ocean alkalinity. Energy. 20(9): 915–922. doi:10.1016/0360–5442(95)00035-F. [Google Scholar]
  54. Werner, C; Schmidt, H-P; Gerten, D; Lucht, W; Kammann, C. “Biogeochemical potential of biomass pyrolysis systems for limiting global warming to 1.5 °C”. Environmental Research Letters, 13(4): 044036. doi:10.1088/1748–9326/aabb0e (2018) [Google Scholar]
  55. Smit, Berend; Reimer, Jeffrey A.; Oldenburg, Curtis M.; Bourg, Ian C. Introduction to Carbon Capture and Sequestration. London: Imperial College Press. ISBN 978–1783263288 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  56. Florian Kraxner; Kentaro Aoki; Sylvain Leduc et al. BECCS in South Korea-Analyzing the negative emissions potential of bioenergy as a mitigation tool. Renewable energy, 61, p.102–108 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  57. Frank Zeman. Energy and Material Balance of CO2 Capture from Ambient Air. Environ. Sci. Technol, 41(21): 7558–63. Bibcode:2007EnST.41.7558Z. doi:10.1021/es070874m. PMID 18044541. [Google Scholar]
  58. Global CCS Institute Media Releases. Retrieved 2019–3–18. [Google Scholar]
  59. [USC04] 26 USC 45Q: Credit for carbon oxide sequestration. Retrieved 2018–12–08. [Google Scholar]
  60. Shiyan Chang, Dingqian Zheng, Meng Fu. Biomass combined with carbon capture and storage technology (BECCS) under 2℃/1.5℃ temperature control target. Global Energy Internet, 03 (2019) [Google Scholar]
  61. Lund H; Mathiesen, B.V. Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems — The case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050. Energy (Oxford), 34(5), p.524–53 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  62. Hans Christian Gils; Sonja Simon. Carbon neutral archipelago-100% renewable energy supply for the Canary Islands. Applied energy, 188, p.342–355 (2017) [Google Scholar]
  63. Nasim Pour; Paul A. Webley; Peter J. Cook. Opportunities for application of BECCS in the Australian power sector. Applied energy, 224, p.615–635 (2018) [Google Scholar]
  64. Emissions Gap Report 2020. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.