Open Access
Issue
E3S Web of Conf.
Volume 388, 2023
The 4th International Conference of Biospheric Harmony Advanced Research (ICOBAR 2022)
Article Number 04015
Number of page(s) 5
Section Technological Influence on Society and Applied Social Sciences to Support Sustainable Society
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202338804015
Published online 17 May 2023
  1. A. Gallegos, “WHO Declares Public Health Emergency for Novel Coronavirus.” [Online]. Available:https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/924596. [Accessed: 10-Sep–2020]. [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Hapsari, Konflik Peran Ganda dan Kesejahteraan Psikologis Pekerja yang Menjalani Work From Home Selama Pandemi COVID-19, J. Psikol., 13, 1 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  3. D. Utami and F. Andriyani, Gambaran Tingkat Stres dalam Pelaksanaan Work From Home selama Masa Pandemi COVID 19 di DKI Jakarta, Muhammadiyah Public Heal Journal, 1, 2 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  4. P. A. Yuliani, Perusahaan di Jakarta Sudah Terapkan WFH https://m.mediaindonesia.com/megapolitan/310645/3964-perusahaan-di-jakarta-sudahterapkan-wfh (2020). [Google Scholar]
  5. Tirto.id, Pekerja Nilai Positif WFH, Meski diterjang Kesepian dan Naiknya Biaya https://tirto.id/pekerja-nilai-positif-wfh-meskiditerjang-kesepian-naiknya-biaya-gd5x (2021) [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Muslim, Mananjemen Stres pada Mas Pandemi COVID-19, ESENSI J. Manaj. Bisnis, 23, 2 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Waizenegger, M. Solga, D. Petko & T. Sudmann, On the effects of COVID-19 Safer-At- Home policies on social inequality. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 68, 100523 doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100523 (2020) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. M. R. Paredes, V. Apaolaza, C. Fernandez- Robin, P. Hartmann, and D. Yañez-Martinez, The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on subjective mental well-being: The interplay of perceived threat, future anxiety and resilience, Pers. Individ. Dif., 170, 110455 (2021). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. C. P. Adiputra, Work From Home (WFH) vs Work From Office (WFO): Pro dan Kontra, Ruangkerja (2021). [Google Scholar]
  10. A. M. A. Pratiwi, M. Pertiwi, and A. R. Andriany, Hubungan Subjective Well Being dengan komitmen organisasi pada pekerja yang melakukan work from home di masa pandemi Covid 19, Syntax, 2, 11, pp. 825 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Yildirim and G. Arslan, Exploring The Associations Between Resilience, Dispositional Hope, Preventive Behaviours, Subjecttive Well-Being, and Psychological Health Among Adults during Early Stage of COVID-19, Curr.Psychol., pp. 1–11 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Kimhi, Y. Eshel, H. Marciano, and B. Adini,A renewed outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study of distress,resilience, and subjective well-being, Int. J.Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 21, pp. 7743,(2020). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L. K. M. U. Bangsa, LPDB-KUMKM Gelar Doa Bersama secara Virtual, Berharap Pandemi COVID-19 Segera Berakhir, Humas LPDB_KUMKM (2021). [Google Scholar]
  14. S. A. Satici, A. R. Kayis, B. Satici, M. D. Griffiths, and G. Can, Resilience, hope, and subjective happiness among the Turkish population: Fear of COVID-19 as a mediator, Int. J. Ment. Health Addict, pp. 1–16 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  15. R. S. Devi, H. Iskandaria, and P. Suryandari, Pusat Pelatihan Nasional Biliar Dengan Konsep Arsitektur Modern Di Setiabudi Jakarta Selatan, Maestro, 4,1 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  16. D. Olson and J. DeDrain, Marriage and Families, Bost. McGrow Hill, 100, 5 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  17. G. E. Richardson, The Metatheory of Resiliency, J. Clin. Psychol., 58, 3, pp. 307–321 (2002). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. K. Connor and J. Davidson, Development of a New Resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilince Scale (CD-RISC), Depress. Anxiety, 18, 2, pp. 76–82 (2003). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. B. Satria and M. Sari, Tingkat Reliensi Masyarakat di Area Rawan Bencana, Idea Nurs. J., 8, 2, pp. 30–34 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Oktavia and P. Muhopilah, Model Konseptual Resiliensi di masa Pandemi COVID-19: Pengaruh Religiusitas, Dukungan Sosial dan Spiritualitas, PSIKOLOGIKA, 26, 1 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  21. E. Diener, Subjective Well-Being The Science and a Proposal for a National Index, Am. Psychol. Assoc., 1, 34 (2000). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Kurnia, Karyawan Lebih Puas Kerja di Kantor dengan Teknologi Maju, Liputan 6 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  23. Y. Pratiwi, Cerita Work From Home para Pekerja Obukota, Ada yang Stress dan Nyaman,Tempo (2020). [Google Scholar]
  24. K. Tonkin, S. Malinen, K. Naswall, and J. Kuntz, Building Employee Resilience Through Wellbeing in Organizations, Hum. Resour. Dev. Q., pp. 107–124 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  25. T. K. Murugesan and R. Megavannan, The Effect of Resilience, EI & Well-Being on Employee Performance – An Exploratory Study of BPO & ITES, Asian J. Res. Soc. Sciances Humanit., 8, 5 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  26. R. Ruiter and B. V Borne, Indicators of Subjective and Psychological Wellbeing as Correlates of Teacher Burnout in the Eastern Cape Public Schools, South Africa, Academicjournals.Org, 3, pp. 160–169 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Octariyani and A. Baidun, Uji Validitas Konstruk Resiliensi, JP31, 4, 1 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  28. M. T. Khosyi, Hubungan Antara Regulasi Emosi Dengan Subjective Well-Being Pada Mahasiwa Kuliah Online Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  29. E. Diener, New Well-Being Measures: Short Scale to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feeling, Soc. Indic. Res., 97, pp. 143–156 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.