Open Access
Issue
E3S Web Conf.
Volume 716, 2026
The 12th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality, Ventilation & Energy Conservation in Buildings (IAQVEC 2026)
Article Number 03011
Number of page(s) 5
Section Thermal Comfort
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202671603011
Published online 09 June 2026
  1. Farahani, A.V.; Jokisalo J.; Korhonen N.; Jylhä K.; Kosonen R. Simulation analysis of Finnish residential buildings' resilience to hot summers under a changing climate. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 82, 108348. [Google Scholar]
  2. Elnagar, E.; Zeoli A.; Rahif R.; Attia S.; Lemort V. A qualitative assessment of integrated active cooling systems: A review with a focus on system flexibility and climate resilience. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 175, 113179. [Google Scholar]
  3. Engelmann, P.; Kalz D.; Salvalai G. Cooling concepts for non-residential buildings: A comparison of cooling concepts in different climate zones. Energy Build. 2014, 82, 447-456. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sepùlveda, A.; Salehi S.S.S.; De Luca F.; Thalfeldt M. Solar radiation-based method for early design stages to balance daylight and thermal comfort in office buildings. Front. Archit. Res. 2023, 12, 1030-1046. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mao, N.; Pan D.; Li Z.; Xu Y.; Song M.; Deng S. A numerical study on influences of building envelope heat gain on operating performances of a bed-based task/ambient air conditioning (TAC) system in energy saving and thermal comfort. Appl. Energy 2017, 192, 213221. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lukastsuk, J.; Kurnitski J.; Thalfeldt M. Measured performance of cooling systems in nearly zero-energy office buildings during extreme summers and optimal cooling sizing. Energy Build. 2025, 116829. [Google Scholar]
  7. Vivek, T.; Balaji K. Heat transfer and thermal comfort analysis of thermally activated building system in warm and humid climate-A case study in an educational building. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2023, 183, 107883. [Google Scholar]
  8. Chakroun, W.; Ghaddar N.; Ghali K. Chilled ceiling and displacement ventilation aided with personalized evaporative cooler. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 3250-3257. [Google Scholar]
  9. Albahri, O.S.; Alamoodi A.H.; Deveci M.; Albahri A.S.; Mahmoud M.A.; Sharaf I.M.; Coffman D. Multi-perspective evaluation of integrated active cooling systems using fuzzy decision making model. Energy Policy 2023, 182, 113775. [Google Scholar]
  10. Pfafferott, J.Ü.; Herkel S.; Kalz D.E.; Zeuschner A. Comparison of low-energy office buildings in summer using different thermal comfort criteria. Energy Build. 2007, 39, 750757. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kiil, M.; Simson R.; Thalfeldt M.; Kurnitski J. A comparative study on cooling period thermal comfort assessment in modern open office landscape in Estonia. Atmosphere (Basel). 2020, 11, doi:https:10.3390/atmos11020127. [Google Scholar]
  12. Kiil, M.; Vôsa 1 2 3, K.-V.; Simson I.R.; Mikola A. Draught and Ventilation Effectiveness in Large and High Space with Excessive Heat Gains. In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 15th REHVA HVAC World Congress-CLIMA 2025: Volume 2; Springer Nature, 2026; Vol. 2, p. 443. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dantec Dynamics A/S ComfortSense Probes Available online: https://www.dantecdynamics.com/product-category/thermal-comfort/comfortsense-probes/. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lestinen, S.; Kilpeläinen S.; Kosonen R.; Jokisalo J.; Koskela H.; Melikov A. Deviation of draught rate in a simplified office environment with diffuse ceiling ventilation; 2019; [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.